Assessment Exercise | 9 Co-funded by the European Union (2023-2-ES01-KA210-VET-000180154). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Spanish Service for the Internationalisation of Education (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor SEPIE can be held responsible for them. CORRECT ANSWER Explanation: Establishing long-term relationships with suppliers of sustainable materials ensures a consistent supply and supports broader sustainability goals. CORRECT ANSWER Explanation: Reducing textile waste decreases both the cost associated with waste management and the environmental strain caused by production processes. 19. What are the environmental and economic benefits of achieving a 30% reduction in textile waste generation over six months? a. Reduction in waste disposal costs and lower environmental impact b. Increase in production and availability of low-quality clothing c. Increase in the final product price due to less waste d. Greater use of synthetic materials in production Incorrect answers – (b) Decreasing waste does not necessarily correlate with increased production of low-quality clothing; it often leads to better resource management. – (c) Typically, reducing waste is likely to decrease, not increase, production costs and product prices. – (d) Reducing waste does not imply a greater use of synthetic materials; sustainable practices often promote natural or recycled materials. 20. How could EcoDenim Co. establish and manage partnerships with suppliers of recycled materials and sustainable fibers to increase the use of these resources by 40%? a. By negotiating long-term contracts with sustainable material suppliers b. By increasing the purchase of materials without sustainability certification c. By frequently changing suppliers to reduce costs d. By selecting only local suppliers, regardless of their sustainability practices Incorrect answers – (b) Purchasing materials without sustainability certification could undermine the environmental integrity of the supply chain. – (c) Frequently changing suppliers might reduce costs temporarily but can compromise the quality and consistency of sustainable materials. – (d) Focusing solely on local suppliers doesn’t guarantee sustainability; comprehensive evaluation of practices is necessary.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=