Assignments | 9 Co-funded by the European Union (2023-2-ES01-KA210-VET-000180154). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Spanish Service for the Internationalisation of Education (SEPIE). Neither the European Union nor SEPIE can be held responsible for them. – Round the average score if necessary (Interpreting the Average Score: 1.0 - 2.0: Low impact on sustainability; significant improvements are needed. 2.1 - 3.0: Moderate impact; some sustainable practices have been implemented, but there is room for improvement. 3.1 - 4.0: Good impact on sustainability; solid practices are in place, but further optimization is possible. 4.1 - 5.0: High positive impact on sustainability; aligned with the best practices in the industry.) 8. Overall Evaluation and Recommendations After scoring each section, calculate the average sustainability score for the entire product lifecycle: x Average Sustainability Score: – Average of 1-2: Indicates a low impact on sustainability, with many areas for improvement. – Average of 3: Indicates a moderate impact, with good initiatives but still opportunities for optimization. – Average of 4-5: Indicates a high positive impact on sustainability, aligned with best practices in eco-design and circular economy. After this, identify the three main areas where changes can be made to increase sustainability, such as improving materials, reducing energy use, or optimizing recycling. x Key Areas for Improvement: 1. 2. 3. x Provide 3 specific suggestions to improve the score, such as adopting water-saving technologies, establishing product collection programs, or using certified materials. x Recommendations to Enhance Sustainability: 1. 2. 3.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NzYwNDE=